March 11, 2010

9th U.S. Circuit OKs ‘under God’ in Pledge of Allegiance

Filed under: United States — Cato Uticensis @ 11:39 PM

At the heart of this case is Micheal Newdow. In a 2-1 ruling, the court says the phrase ‘under God’ is constitutional and can stay in the Pledge of Allegiance.

SAN FRANCISCO – A federal appeals court in San Francisco upheld the use of the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance and “In God We Trust” on U.S. currency, rejecting arguments on Thursday that the phrases violate the separation of church and state.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel rejected two legal challenges by Sacramento atheist Michael Newdow, who claimed the references to God disrespect his religious beliefs.

“The Pledge is constitutional,” Judge Carlos Bea wrote for the majority in the 2-1 ruling. “The Pledge of Allegiance serves to unite our vast nation through the proud recitation of some of the ideals upon which our Republic was founded.”

Read rest here>>>



Promoting Limited Government,Constitutional Rights and Personal Responsibility

Conservative Books and Conservative Book Club

No related posts.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree